panerai 1392 vs 1312 | pam 1312 case thickness panerai 1392 vs 1312 I have the 1312 but might consider trading in for 42mm 1392 or Submersible 682. If my wrist was 7 inch, I would have no doubt about keeping it. $5,799.00
0 · pam 1392 vs 1312
1 · pam 1312 reviews
2 · pam 1312 case thickness
3 · officine Panerai pam 1312
4 · bendannie luminor marina
5 · Panerai pam 1392 lug to lug
6 · Panerai luminor marina pam 1312
7 · Panerai luminor marina manual
Technical excellence and elegance beyond compare: Discover the watches of the Diver 300M 007 Edition Collection on the Official OMEGA® site! Take advantage of the full OMEGA® experience, browse the entire collection .
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the . While in reality the new Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with the same 44 mm diameter case as it predecessor the PAM 312, at least optically, the watch . I have the 1312 but might consider trading in for 42mm 1392 or Submersible 682. If my wrist was 7 inch, I would have no doubt about keeping it. Guys, I'm thinking of trading my 1312 for a 1392. After wearing my Rolexes for the last month or so straight, whenever I put on my Panerai, it just seems so big. Interested in your thoughts on this move. I realize it's not .
Of course one day I had to come across a post about the PAM 1312, an updated version of my favorite Panerai! After a short conversation with its owner, u/Papooskimo, I found out Panerai .The new Officine Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with an exquisite black dial that has 'ecru' superluminova, a stellar blue seconds hand, and a date aperture at 3 o'clock.
The Panerai Luminor PAM 1392 is rated to 10bar (roughly 100 meters), which is more than adequate for spending time in the pool, surfing, snorkeling, and even most mild recreational .
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs . My first impressions compared to the older version PAM 392 would be that it is really possible to feel the difference of height and weight of the case and also the blue seconds hand .Both the 1312 and the 312 are 44mm but because of the thinner case the 1312 does look to the eye to be slightly smaller. Because of the thinner case the crown protector is also a bit thinner. . I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: Panerai 1392. Diameter = 42.0 mm.
While in reality the new Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with the same 44 mm diameter case as it predecessor the PAM 312, at least optically, the watch seems to look slightly smaller due to its thinner case. I have the 1312 but might consider trading in for 42mm 1392 or Submersible 682. If my wrist was 7 inch, I would have no doubt about keeping it. Guys, I'm thinking of trading my 1312 for a 1392. After wearing my Rolexes for the last month or so straight, whenever I put on my Panerai, it just seems so big. Interested in your thoughts on this move. I realize it's not significantly smaller but it is 2mm thinner as well. Of course one day I had to come across a post about the PAM 1312, an updated version of my favorite Panerai! After a short conversation with its owner, u/Papooskimo, I found out Panerai actually makes the exact same watch in 42mm called the 1392! Like its bigger brother, the 1392 came in a 1950 cushion shape case with brushed side and polish .
The new Officine Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with an exquisite black dial that has 'ecru' superluminova, a stellar blue seconds hand, and a date aperture at 3 o'clock.
The Panerai Luminor PAM 1392 is rated to 10bar (roughly 100 meters), which is more than adequate for spending time in the pool, surfing, snorkeling, and even most mild recreational diving for that matter. I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: Panerai 1392 Diameter = 42.0 mm Case thickness = 13.2 mm Lug width = 22.0 mm Lug to Lug - ? Panerai 1312 Diameter = 44.0 mm Case thickness = 15.6 mm My first impressions compared to the older version PAM 392 would be that it is really possible to feel the difference of height and weight of the case and also the blue seconds hand is a nice touch referencing to the vintage models. It originally comes with the black alligator strap, here's my choice: 1. Vig2000, Travelller, jaychief and 20 others.Both the 1312 and the 312 are 44mm but because of the thinner case the 1312 does look to the eye to be slightly smaller. Because of the thinner case the crown protector is also a bit thinner. The lugs are much thinner on the 1312 compared to the older style 312, the case is only a few mm thinner but it makes a difference for sure.
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: Panerai 1392. Diameter = 42.0 mm. While in reality the new Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with the same 44 mm diameter case as it predecessor the PAM 312, at least optically, the watch seems to look slightly smaller due to its thinner case. I have the 1312 but might consider trading in for 42mm 1392 or Submersible 682. If my wrist was 7 inch, I would have no doubt about keeping it. Guys, I'm thinking of trading my 1312 for a 1392. After wearing my Rolexes for the last month or so straight, whenever I put on my Panerai, it just seems so big. Interested in your thoughts on this move. I realize it's not significantly smaller but it is 2mm thinner as well.
Of course one day I had to come across a post about the PAM 1312, an updated version of my favorite Panerai! After a short conversation with its owner, u/Papooskimo, I found out Panerai actually makes the exact same watch in 42mm called the 1392! Like its bigger brother, the 1392 came in a 1950 cushion shape case with brushed side and polish .The new Officine Panerai Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days PAM 1312 comes with an exquisite black dial that has 'ecru' superluminova, a stellar blue seconds hand, and a date aperture at 3 o'clock.
The Panerai Luminor PAM 1392 is rated to 10bar (roughly 100 meters), which is more than adequate for spending time in the pool, surfing, snorkeling, and even most mild recreational diving for that matter.
I am trying to find information on the lug-to-lug distance for both PAM 1392 and PAM 1312. Can't figure out which size I want and I wasn't able to stop by an AD. Here are the specs I have so far: Panerai 1392 Diameter = 42.0 mm Case thickness = 13.2 mm Lug width = 22.0 mm Lug to Lug - ? Panerai 1312 Diameter = 44.0 mm Case thickness = 15.6 mm
My first impressions compared to the older version PAM 392 would be that it is really possible to feel the difference of height and weight of the case and also the blue seconds hand is a nice touch referencing to the vintage models. It originally comes with the black alligator strap, here's my choice: 1. Vig2000, Travelller, jaychief and 20 others.
parfum hermes barbati
pam 1392 vs 1312
pam 1312 reviews
Jul 3, 2016. I have a piece of Rolex Air King 144000 purchased in 1998. I am very fond of this timepiece both for its simplicity in style and the uniqueness of its history. However there is relatively few discussion of this model and I would like to see if there are other AK owners willing to share their experience and opinions here.
panerai 1392 vs 1312|pam 1312 case thickness
